I was watching a program, and like always, it got me thinking. Ya, I watch Family Guy, Robot Chicken, American Dad, Futurama, Father of the Pride and Star Trek reruns … but for the most part, I watch things like Daily Planet, a myriad of documentaries from the making of CERN’s LHC, The Elegant Universe (one of my favourite series), Nova and lots of stuff generally found on National Geographic, Discovery and yes, PBS.
I am not the typical “tree-huggin’, pot-smokin’, whale-savin’, tie-dyin’” hippie earth-lover … I don’t smoke pot, I am not politically correct, I understand how a lot of things work together in the environment. Yes, there is too much plastic in the ocean. Yes, we need more trees. Burning anything for fuel is bad. Carbon Credits are a complete lie.
*regains original thought*
So, this program got me thinking. In the Netherlands, in order to reduce traffic, they are giving money to people who avoid using their car. In the United Kingdom, they are expanding the Tube, adding busses and charging drivers who venture into the city proper in places like London in order to keep traffic down.
However, in North America (ya, Canada is as guilty… almost) the way in which pollution, stress and traffic in general is being fought is to simply let people know where the gridlock is. Very little is being done to promote public transit, carpooling, telecommuting – instead, some car-lover wants to make sure that instead of fixing the actual problem, it is apparently better to spend a lot of government money on projects that simply tell anyone with a subscription to avoid the ‘rough spots’. Anyone who isn’t a moron will immediately see (notice – the people who have this idea are not morons … they SEE this, but they are going to make money, so they don’t care) that all the system will do is MOVE the problem … just like burying garbage.
London Speak